InfraResolution Bench

Case Explorer

CRM commitment and billing configuration disagree

CRM shows a Committed-100 plan while the billing system is configured for Committed-150, creating a pricing configuration mismatch without an operational incident.

Evidence Packet

CRM Record

Account: Northstar Labs

Tier: enterprise

Plan: Committed-100

Billing Owner: revops@prime.example

SLA Tier: enterprise-standard

Executed order form lists Committed-100.; No pending amendment recorded in CRM.

Billing Record

Plan: Committed-150

Invoice Preview: $8,200

Credits Applied: $0

Burst GPU Hours: 0

Active billing plan is Committed-150.; No overage line item generated at 118 GPU-hours.

Usage & Telemetry

Window: 2026-03-01 to 2026-03-31

GPU Hours: 118

Meter Status: healthy

Usage telemetry is complete and healthy for the period.

Customer Note

Our invoice preview looks lower than expected. We thought we'd cross our committed amount this month.

Policy Snippet

If CRM contract terms and billing configuration differ, route the case to RevOps for commercial review before final invoicing.

Ground Truth

issue_type: pricing_config_mismatchroot_cause: billing_config_out_of_sync_with_crmcustomer_impact: invoice_confusioncontractual_applicability: not_an_sla_casediscrepancy_detected: truerecommended_owner: shared_revops_financerecommended_action: hold_for_revops_reviewneeds_human_review: trueconfidence: highadjudication_notes: ["The mismatch is between signed commercial terms and billing configuration, not telemetry.","This should be routed for commercial review rather than treated as an SLA matter."]reference_customer_note: We found a mismatch between your contracted plan and the current billing configuration, so we are holding the invoice for RevOps review before confirming the final amount.reference_internal_note: Owner: shared_revops_finance. Action: hold_for_revops_review due to CRM Committed-100 versus billing Committed-150 with healthy usage telemetry.